Lead Ban Chronicles – HSUS Supporting Ethical Hunting?

July 22, 2014

Lead Ban ChroncilesMaybe this is lazy, but I’m going to share a link to someone else’s post about a topic I have never directly addressed.  HSUS and their alleged campaign to “curb the most inhumane and unsporting abuses”

So here’s the link to Don Mallicoat’s column in the Tribune Papers website.

In the column, Mallicoat responds to a challenge to his criticism of the HSUS and their anti-hunting agenda.  The commenter raised the argument that HSUS is not anti-hunting, but only seeks to promote ethical and humane hunting practices.  As Mallicoat points out, HSUS’s record speaks for itself… efforts to ban mourning dove hunts, bear hunts, and other popular hunting practices.

But it was something else that I saw in the HSUS response to Mallicoat’s original column that I think deserves attention… and that’s the statement that “rank and file hunters” are in agreement with the HSUS efforts.

Where do they get that sort of idea?  It doesn’t take a research expert to find examples of hunters attacking hunters over issues from high fence hunting to predator hunting.  The HSUS can take its pick of hunters’ arguments that support their platform… or at least as much of that platform as they’re willing to disclose.  And the hunters just keep feeding them.

I’m not using this as an opportunity to argue that hunters need to stand together regardless of our opinions, or that we have to support methods and practices with which we disagree.  I think an open and ongoing discussion about ethics, safety, and conservation is valuable and good.

At the same time, I really wish more hunters would take a little more care in their criticisms of other hunters.  Are you perpetuating a stereotype with your comments?  How much do you really know about the practice with which you disagree?  Consider your motivation for taking a stance against a practice, and ask yourself who is doing more harm to the future of our sport… the participants, or those who vilify them?

Just something to chew on.  You can spit it out if you don’t like it.



2 Responses to “Lead Ban Chronicles – HSUS Supporting Ethical Hunting?”

  1. Lead Ban Chronicles – HSUS Supporting Ethical Hunting? | on July 22nd, 2014 06:15

    […] Lead Ban Chronicles – HSUS Supporting Ethical Hunting? […]

  2. Jim Demoruelle on July 23rd, 2014 10:16

    A very important point missed is that the lead eaten today is out of the animal in a few hours, thirty six hours at the most for small animals and even if it was several days it would not be long enough to cause toxic contamination to the meat or cause death to the animal. Just another smoke and mirror game for destroying hunting by the Animal Rights movement. They really do work hard to impose the Agenda 21 doctrine to destroy the 2nd Amendment and to stop using meat. Remember when they make such a comment always ask for the scientific documentation that the statement is based on. They do not have one and at that point you get stutter or the deer in the headlight look… A free man does not have to ask permission……Cocker…jimdemoruelle