November 25, 2013
I’ve always been sort of knife crazy. For a brief period, I thought I’d start collecting… but that little fantasy dissolved under the harsh light of basic economics. Knife collecting is not cheap, especially if you want to get into it on any kind of serious basis.
Nevertheless, I’ve managed to put together something of a collection of skinning and hunting knives over the years. Sometimes it was a matter of simple expedience… I was hunting away from home and forgot my skinner. Other times it was more of an impulse buy. And rarely, but often enough to be kind of cool, it’s a case of a publicist or marketing company asking me to try out something new.
Morakniv is not new. In fact, I believe they’ve been making knives in Sweden since the late 19th century. But they still come out with new(ish) ideas, and this year they’ve got a couple of new(ish) twists on the bushcraft knife. Lucky for me, their PR person found the Hog Blog, and their email did not get sent directly to my Spam folder. ABC, tic-tac-toe, and bang… the Bushcraft Orange was on its way.
First of all, some of my American readers may be wondering what a “bushcraft knife” is all about. Bushcraft is all about backcountry survival skills, from foraging to building shelter. You need to get the most out of your tools, and the knife is arguably one of the most critical pieces of your kit. Think “camp knife”, a versatile, fixed blade knife that is hefty enough to cut tent poles and whittle stakes, but handy enough for the finer work, like field dressing and skinning game. Fellow blogger, Suburban Bushwacker spends quite a bit of time in discussion of bushcraft, and has reviewed Mora in the past.
For my own part, my primary need from a working knife is for dressing and skinning game. I also like to use one knife from start to finish, so I need something that holds a good edge, is handy enough for the fine work, but not so fine that I would be afraid to separate joints with it. It’s a sort of stupid point of pride for me, but when I’m breaking down big game, I never use a saw (except to remove a skull cap). I do it all with a knife. This is why I have come to rely so heavily on the old Buck 110 for so long… it’s nearly indestructible.
So earlier last week, the Morakniv Bushcraft Orange arrived in my mail. Unfortunately, the whitetail doe I’d shot the previous night was already skinned and dressed so I couldn’t put my new “toy” to work. However, I was pretty sure the weekend would give me the opportunity to really put this knife through its paces… and it did.
On Sunday morning, Carl, the owner of the Nueces Country Smokehouse gave me a call. He had a couple of deer already checked in. With the cold, rainy weather and the rut just around the corner, he expected more to be coming. I tossed the Mora and a steel in the truck and headed over.
Over the course of the next three hours, I skinned four whitetails and an axis, and caped out a blackbuck. The Mora popped open ribcages, separated knee, tail, and axis joints, and peeled away skin. I didn’t get a chance to hit the steel until I was well into the third deer, and the knife still performed like a champ. After a few swipes of the steel, it was like starting with a freshly sharpened blade.
Now I’ve skinned, dressed, and cut up a lot of animals over the past 30-0dd years. Would I say the Morakniv Bushcraft was the best I ever used? Well, no. For my personal tastes, I have a fondness for the trailing/clip point design like my Buck or my old Schrade “Sharp Finger”. That shape just sort of suits the way I work on an animal. The Bushcraft is more of a drop point (which is still a very effective design), which made me adjust my habits a bit. But other than that, I’d put this knife up against anything else on the market.
Still, good steel that holds up to hard use is one thing. A handy design is another. But for a lot of hunters, reality dictates that they consider the price tag. Here, again, the Morakniv Bushcraft shines… with an MSRP of $34.99.
Sure, you can go out and pick up a more expensive knife. Lord knows I’ve seen some doozies. Seems like all the rich sports from Houston and San Antonio have to show me their “prize” skinners when they’re in the skinning room with me… knives with fine pedigrees and three digit (and more!) price tags. And I have no doubt that these are some high quality blades. But while they’re showing me their fancy knives, I’m the one skinning their deer. And the next one. And the next one.
And I’m doing it with a knife that any hunter can afford.
You can find Morakniv products online, or at many outdoors retailers including Bass Pro, REI, Sportsman’s Warehouse, and many others.
November 13, 2013
When I was in California, it seemed like every weekend involved a road trip. I was usually off to either hunt or guide, but sometimes it was just to get the hell out of the urban jungle that was the San Francisco Bay Area. As a result, my old Dodge stayed packed and ready to go. Behind the driver’s seat you could find a case of bottled water and a Tupperware container full of homemade trail mix.
There’s a lot to say about trail mix, and an awful lot has been written. I won’t (can’t) cover all those bases. But what I can say is that a well-made trail mix is a sure enough blessing for the person on-the-go. It’s generally healthy with lots of natural goodness, and it’s portable. You can eat it while driving, hiking, or riding horseback.
Whenever my tub started to run low, I’d stop off at just about any grocery store or even a truck stop and pick up some dried fruit, nuts, and maybe some yogurt-covered goodies and refill it. Of course, the quality of the ingredients is what distinguishes good trail mix from bad and my random selection didn’t really guarantee any degree of quality. But when you’re hungry, almost anything is good… and it’s hard to mess up almonds, cashews, and peanuts.
Anyway, I thought about that Tupperware tub the other day (I still keep it in my truck), when I received an email from someone at GoBites.com, a company that specializes in “Whole Snacks Delivered”.
What does that mean? It’s kind of an interesting idea.
GoBites makes pre-packaged, portion-controlled trail mix from whole foods ingredients. According to some of the information they sent me, they have over 25 varieties of snacks. 22 of them are made with 100% USDA Organic ingredients. 21 have no wheat or wheat products (gluten free). And most of them are acceptable to either the Mediterranean Diet or the Paleo Diet (if you happen to be into that sort of thing).
I don’t really follow most of the food trends, especially when it comes to special diets. But what I do know, because they sent me a few sample packs, is that these things are pretty danged good. Of course, keep in mind that I like trail mix, granola, and dried fruit. If you don’t, then this probably isn’t going to be for you.
But the thing that’s different with GoBites is that they work on a subscription basis. You sign up for periodic deliveries either every week, two weeks, or four weeks. Each delivery is 14 snack packs, each of which is a reasonably good-sized snack (and I have a hearty appetite). You can choose your own from their menu of offerings, or provide some preferences when you sign up and let their system select the best match for your needs (e.g. Paleo diet, or gluten free).
The price comes out to $1.99 a pack, or just under $28 per order (14 packs). That’s certainly pricier than loading up at the bulk aisle in Safeway, but considering the quality and variety of the ingredients, it’s not a bad way to keep a good stock of snacks for road trips, or for the trail. If you’ve got kids, it seems like this could be a good option for the lunch boxes, or for after school.
There is no contract, so you can drop the service any time. The catch here is that you have to be pro-active because if you don’t cancel, you will continue to receive your packages… and the bill. Just like any other subscription service, you’re obligated until you formally disengage.
At any rate, it seems like an interesting idea, and worth sharing with you readers (and hell, they did send me some free samples).
Personally, I decided I’d sign up for a subscription. I definitely enjoyed most of the samples I tried (there’s one, Mayan Treasure, that I wasn’t crazy about). Also, this will probably be a better snack choice for me than of Kat’s homemade cookies and brownies. But dammit, I LIKE those cookies and brownies. Guess it’s gonna be all about finding a balance.
November 6, 2013
Years ago, when I was barely a teenager, my best friend’s dad got us into waterfowl hunting. It was perfect for us, living right on the banks of the Intracoastal Waterway. We could hop in the canoe and hunt the salt marshes any time we wanted. In an effort to keep us interested in the sport, my friend’s dad told us that the ducks with the big white patch on their heads were “buffleheads,” and were good to eat. What we didn’t know at the time was that the birds were actually hooded mergansers, and that they rate right next to seagull (yes, I’ve tried both) on the table. But for two kids new to the sport, they were beyond plentiful and they decoyed with abandon… and we shot lots of them.
That went on for a couple of years, until the day I decided to cook up one of those birds for myself.
But even after I’d learned to determine “good” birds from “trash”, I still found ducks lacking at the table. My limited culinary expertise told me that chickens have to be thoroughly cooked to kill bacteria, so I applied the same tactic to my ducks (they’re both poultry, right?). Anyone who has tried a well-done, wild duck can attest to the outcome. It’s pretty bad… so bad, in fact, that I was near the point of abandoning duck hunting. If I didn’t want to eat them, I sure didn’t see the point in killing them.
Fortunately, it was just about that time I discovered Justin Wilson (RIP) and an episode about cooking a duck. Right after that, I delved into a couple of wild game cookbooks. The error of my ways shone clear…
Years later, I’d moved to California which is a waterfowler’s paradise. Not too long after that, I met Hank Shaw. Among other things, Hank had just started a blog about cooking wild game. I was immediately impressed by his writing, and while I’ve never been much on following recipes, I was intrigued by some of the things he wrote. When I finally had the opportunity to sample his cooking, I knew this guy was going to do something special. Hank has skills.
Since then, Hank has proven those skills several times over. In addition to other awards and recognition, his blog, Hunter, Angler, Gardener, Cook has been thrice nominated and once selected by the James Beard Foundation as Best Food Blog. In 2011, he published his first book, Hunt Gather Cook, Finding the Forgotten Feast (my review of that one is here, on my old site). And now, just in time for the holidays, he’s published his second work, Duck, Duck, Goose.
And by “just in time for the holidays”, I don’t mean the Christmas gift giving madness (although this book will make an awesome Christmas gift), but the holidays that accompany the prime waterfowl seasons across the U.S. This book can, and should, be the impetus for everything from hearty meals at the duck club to a centerpiece for family gatherings at Thanksgiving and Christmas. There are how-tos and recipes in here for everything from the simplest, slow-roasted whole duck to fairly elaborate productions and charcuterie (goose prosciutto anyone?).
As with pretty much anything Hank does, Duck, Duck, Goose is not your average cook book. First of all, Hank is all about the details. Whether you’re an experienced chef or a neophyte, there’s nothing in this book that will leave you guessing. From identification and understanding the difference between various ducks and geese - to plucking, dressing, and butchering birds for the table – to preparation styles based on the different qualities of the duck you have in your hand (all ducks are not cooked equally)… you’ll find pretty much anything you need to know.
Hank draws from, literally, an entire world of influences and styles… and these are all represented in Duck, Duck, Goose. There are recipes for braunschweiger to bulgogi, confit to cassoulet, and tea-smoked duck to Thai duck curry. If you never used another duck and goose cookbook, you wouldn’t ever be bored. In fact, I didn’t count them all, but I’d say you could almost pick a different recipe for every day of the duck season and experience truly global cuisine from a South Carolina-style barbecue on the opener, to a hot bowl of duck pho after a frigid, season closer.
One other thing that sets this book (and Hank) apart is that it’s based on the principle of eating everything but the quack. There’s more to cooking a duck than breasting it out and leaving the rest for the ‘coons. Hank shows us not just how to cook the wings and legs, but the hearts, gizzards, livers, feet, and even the tongues. Not satisfied to stop there, Duck, Duck, Goose includes recipes for rendering and cooking with duck and goose fat (there’s a hollandaise sauce in there that’s just screaming my name).
And, finally, there’s the photography. The book is a beautiful package and worth the extra bulk of a hard-copy for the photos alone. Hank’s long-time girlfriend, hunting buddy, and guinea pig, Holly Heyser combines a great eye for composition with a real passion for the subject matter (waterfowl and food) in order to pull together an incredible set of photos for Duck, Duck, Goose.
You can find a copy of Duck, Duck, Goose (or a bunch of copies… they’re great gifts) on Amazon in either hard back or Kindle e-book. I highly recommend it, whether you’re a waterfowler looking for new ways to feed the family or an experienced chef. Hell, even if you’re like me and refuse to follow a recipe, it’s a great source of diverse ideas and inspiration.
August 21, 2013
If you spend much time around folks who’ve been shooting and hunting as long as I have, you’ve probably noticed a couple of common traits. We’ll lean forward a bit when you speak to us. We’ll often ask you to repeat what you’ve said. Some of us might even cup our ears in the universal sign of, “speak up, please.”
When I started shooting, you didn’t hear much about hearing protection. I’m sure someone must have known about the risks, but no one really talked about it. You just took the gun and went out to shoot it. No one bothered to tell you to wear ear plugs. I remember in Boy Scout camp, I’d spend every available minute at the rifle range. They didn’t pass out hearing protection or safety glasses (of course, these were just .22 rifles, but still…). I’m pretty sure that if I’d shown up at the junkyard to shoot with my friends, I’d have been laughed clean out of the woods for wearing a set of “Mickey ears”. And if I ever showed up in hunting camp with a set of plugs in my ears, the old guys would have looked at my dad and wondered what sort of spoiled little pansy-ass he was raising. That’s just how things were then, and many of us are paying the price today.
In fact, it wasn’t until I was late into my teens that I first learned the importance and value of hearing protection while shooting. I think the catalyst was an article I read in Outdoor Life about how a shooter’s flinch is often a response to the noise of the firearm, rather than a response to the recoil. It made sense to me, and the next time I went out in the woods to shoot up a bunch of cans and paper plates, I took a roll of toilet paper. I stuffed a goodly wad into each ear, settled down and started shooting.
And I was amazed that there was a noticeable change in my groups, especially with my .243 which is still one of the loudest rifles I own (not counting the ones with muzzle brakes). I realized that I wasn’t anticipating the shot as much, and I was able to stay on the target right through the muzzle blast. Of course, I was noticing things I’d never paid attention to before, so maybe the change wasn’t as extreme as it seemed at the time, but there was definitely a difference. Perhaps the best thing was that I didn’t have to sit through school the next day with that infernal ringing in my ears. I was sold.
I eventually graduated from wadded up toilet paper to those orange or yellow safety plugs. I was working at paper mills at the time, and there were always jugs of plugs available for the taking and I made the best of it. A few years later when I started shooting at organized ranges, I moved up to ear muffs (Mickey ears), and then discovered electronic hearing protection at the SHOT Show.
The thing about wearing hearing protection is that it doesn’t just reduce the noise of a gunshot, it reduces all noise. It’s difficult to have a conversation with plugs in your ears. It’s even more difficult to hunt without the ability to hear all of the sounds of the woods around you. Even most of the electronic aids that amplify normal noise but block sudden, loud noises can be a real detriment in the field. The amplification makes the slightest rustle of grass sound like an elephant charge, and if you turn them down enough to dampen the noise of your footsteps then you can’t hear much of anything. As a result, like many people, I’ve stopped wearing hearing protection while I’m in the field.
The industry has been all over the place in an effort to create hearing protection that allows you to hear and function normally while still dampening dangerous noise. The electronic solutions are the best, so far, but the quality options are all pretty expensive… generally in the range of several hundred dollars for a set of good ear buds, to over a grand for the high-end, digital systems. There are also some electronic hearing protection devices in the $25 to $50 range. These are fine for target shooting and plinking, but terribly unsuitable for hunting applications.
There have also been advances in the design of the basic ear plug. While you can certainly still get the old-fashioned, squeezable foam plugs, there are newer designs that offer baffles that create a better fit in the ear canal and block even more of the noise. I know, for example, that shooting my .325wsm with the muzzle brake is too much for the old-school plugs. They help, but I still end up with ringing ears after a couple of shots. The baffled plugs work much better. But of course these make hearing other sounds practically impossible.
BattlePlugs are, according to the manufacturer’s website, authorized hearing protectors for use by the U.S. Army… both for soldiers and civilian employees. They offer a non-electronic filter that dampens sudden, loud noises (e.g. gunfire) while allowing normal soundwaves to pass through.
How do they work?
Well, I’m not a specialist in this kind of thing so I don’t pretend to understand the science here. However, the plugs have a little cap that opens or closes. When the cap is closed, you get a pretty significant reduction in sound (about 24dB). When it’s open, the reduction is about 9dB. I’m not sure if there’s some sort of high tech thing happening in there, or if it’s just simple physics. If I open the cap and look inside, it’s just a tiny tunnel from end to end.
But they do seem to work as advertised.
I received a sample pair last week, and had a little time to mess around with them. They were a little uncomfortable to put in, but once they were in place they filled my ear canal very snugly (I got the medium size. They come in three sizes.) and were quite comfortable. With the cap closed, they really dampen all the sound like a super-effective ear plug would be expected to. You can still hear, but not much. With the cap open, I was able to watch TV… although the sound was somewhat muffled. Carrying on a conversation was possible, but not optimal. 9dB of sound reduction is a lot more than it may seem.
I did have some trouble opening and closing the cap without removing the plugs from my ears, but the literature that accompanies the plugs indicated that I should expect this until I got used to using them. That’s probably true enough, and I also think they just need to be opened and closed a few times until they loosen up. Overall, I didn’t find this to be much of an issue.
I took the BattlePlugs out behind the barn this weekend to test them under fire. I started out with the .22 pistol, which is really not much of an ear ringer without protection. It wasn’t much of a test. After emptying a few mags with the .22, I moved up to 9mm which was still pretty much nothing, and then to the .44 mag. Now, my .44 is loud, even with the 7.5″ barrel on it. I don’t like shooting it without hearing protection. With the BattlePlugs in and the little cap closed, the report of the .44 was nicely muffled. That wasn’t really a surprise, based on how completely they fill my ear canal. With the cap open, the report was not unpleasant at all, and it was still muffled enough that I didn’t get any ringing in my ears. That’s not very scientific, but it was a good practical experience.
Unfortunately, I didn’t try them with any of the braked rifles (.270, 30-06, .325wsm). Sorry, but with temps in the low 100s, I just didn’t feel like sitting out in the sun any longer. Based on the results with the .44, I feel confident that the BattlePlugs would be plenty sufficient for shooting a braked gun. They’re miles and miles better than the old, orange squeezables. I think they also outperform my cheap, Outers ear muffs.
BattlePlugs retail for around $12.75. That’s about $10 more than the old-fashioned plugs ($2.95/pkg at WalMart), but about half the price of low-end electronic muffs. The plugs are washable, so if you take care of them you should get a bunch of uses out of them. I expect that the baffles will eventually start to wear and tear, but of course I haven’t had these long enough to see any sort of wear. You can also order additional tips for about $3, in the event that the originals do finally wear out.
Overall, if you’re looking for something relatively inexpensive but effective, and don’t want the bulk of a pair of muffs, the BattlePlugs are certainly a good option. I’ve used other baffled plugs in the past, and the BattlePlugs are at least as good as any of those. The option of opening the cap to allow for better hearing is a nice feature, I suppose, although honestly; I find it’s just as easy to remove the plugs so that’s not much of a selling point.
BattlePlugs are currently available online, from National Safety, Inc. I found them at a few other industrial safety equipment sites as well. I haven’t seen them at any of the major outdoors distributors yet, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see them start showing up soon.
June 10, 2013
In the dusty recesses of my desk, I uncovered a veritable treasure trove of stuff that I need to review. OK, there were only a couple of things that had been stowed away while I’m remodeling my office, but I was glad to find them. Because I spent the better part of this past weekend in the air between NC and TX, the first item I chose to review was a book… Nature Wars by Jim Sterba.
Nature Wars is an attempt to describe how our efforts to manage wildlife turned out to be too successful. It’s an excellent illustration of the rule of unintended consequences… or how the road to hell is actually paved.
In the book, Sterba lays out his case in three key parts. First, there is the foundation of all wildlife… the forests. We read the tale of how the great forests were initially decimated as the country was settled. Most of us are familiar with this part of the story, but Sterba takes us a little deeper with facts (and factoids) so that, instead of reading like an indictment of evil, it’s easy to understand how it happened. For example, he explains how critical wood was to the early settlers as a building material and a source of power and heat. Then he shows us how the eastern forests have been in a fairly continuous state of regrowth. It is no longer “recovery”, but expansion. In some places the eastern forests cover even more ground than they did when the settlers first arrived.
Later, he goes into the history of wildlife and how close we came to completely wiping out entire species through uncontrolled hunting (especially market hunting), habitat loss, and disease. The way west was paved by the beaver, as the rodent’s skin practically drove the entire economy. As beavers were wiped out of one area, the trappers continued to push them further and further west. Their current comeback has created multiple conflicts as they must now share their habitat with humans. Beavers don’t really differentiate between landscape and wild trees. And once they begin to dam a watercourse, that water has to go somewhere… which often means it backs up over roadways, fields, and even homes.
Likewise, Sterba tells the story of the decimation and recovery of whitetail deer and turkeys… both of which have become nuisances, or even menaces to farmers, homeowners, and drivers. As with the other sections, Sterba uses a combination of historical data, statistics, and anecdotal information to make his case.
Throughout the book, Sterba manages to maintain something of a netural-but-interested perspective. While you can certainly sense occasional narrative bias, he leaves most of the judgment to the reader. “But,” he seems to say. “Before you judge, consider the whole story through the perspective of the people who were there.”
Did I “like” the book?
I found it very interesting, and it made me consider some things I hadn’t thought about before. It was sort of strange that, after reading the first half on the way into Wilmington, NC., I noticed how much bigger the trees in and around town seemed to be. The old highway corridor from the airport to my mom’s house was practically walled by enormous trees (liberally hung with kudzu). I don’t recall it ever looking that way. I think this is part of what he was talking about when he described the “reforestation” that’s happening before our eyes.
I also really appreciated his discussion of the complicated web of “solutions” for the current issues caused by the return of so many wildlife species. I know how some of those conversations can turn, and how logic is often overwhelmed by emotion. California is one perfect example of wildlife management through the ballot box, but as Sterba points out in the book, CA is hardly unique there.
Sterba’s writing is very good. The writing itself is clean, and he builds each paragraph carefully. I found little to complain about, except that much of the book is very dry. At times I did have to labor a bit to keep reading because even though the story was very interesting, the storytelling was sort of flat. I’ve certainly seen it done better… but I’ve also seen much, much worse.
You can find Nature Wars on Amazon or most other online booksellers.
May 22, 2013
I just got the latest from my friends at Impressum Media, the producers of The Firearms Guide DVDs.
Every year, I kind of wonder what in the world they can do to improve this incredible firearms reference guide. It already has tens of thousands of firearms, conversion charts to help international hunters match up European calibers with US equivalents, printable targets, and so much more. But they’ve done it. Not only have they continued to expand the listings of conventional guns, including printable schematics, but they’ve now added an extensive listing of military firearms, historic and modern. As a minor war history buff, I found the listings of military firearms to be pretty danged cool.
As I clicked through the DVD, I was quickly overwhelmed with the amount of information it provides. Simple browsing can be fun, but sometimes you want to be very specific. No problem. Because the whole guide is built on a database engine, you can search based on a wide variety of keywords, from action type, to manufacturer, to available calibers, and much more. There is even a FFL dealer reference.
Powder-burning firearms are not the only guns included, as the Guide covers a variety of air rifles and pistols. And, not only does the reference cover firearms, but there is also an extensive listing of ammunition, from antique through 21st Century high-tech.
There’s simply an insane amount of information packed into this single DVD, which is available for both Mac and PC platforms.
Who would use something like this? Let’s see. There would be:
- Gun enthusiasts
- Gun dealers
- Gun writers
- Journalists (this should be a required reference for every news desk)
- Authors who want authenticity and accuracy
The DVD is available now at: http://www.firearmsguide.com Retail price is $39.95.
April 2, 2013
Not too long ago, I was bemoaning the dearth of gear I had for review. Things have been slow since I moved this site last January, and the manufacturers (and their marketing reps) haven’t exactly been beating their way to my door. But I’ve kept at it, and following the SHOT Show I was able to get a few items sent my way, including a pair of head lamps from the Dorcy company.
Some of you know that I’ve been on the perpetual search for a compact headlamp that is bright enough for night time blood-trailing. I’ve used several really nice lights, but so far, none of them has really been able to compete with a good, handheld flashlight. I know, maybe I’m asking too much. Headlights are awesome for most other activities, from setting up camp or cooking dinner on the grill, to field dressing game in the dark. Almost everything I’ve tested so far has been perfectly fine for that.
When the folks from Dorcy contacted me, I had the option of testing the headlamps or one of their new, compact LED flashlights. After some vacillation, I decided I’d try once more with the headlamps. They sent me two versions, one with a 134 lumen, spotlight beam, and one with a broad, 120 lumen floodlight.
By all accounts, that’s a lot of power in a small light. But, while I’m no engineer, my research on compact lights has shown that high lumens doesn’t always equate to a quality light. There are many other factors involved, most of which tend to drive the price point higher and higher. For example, there are some really high-end, compact headlamps that retail for upwards of $150, and those are only outputting about 100 lumens. The Dorcy lights, on the other hand, retail for under $25.
So what do you get for $25?
I had every hope of putting these lights to work on an actual hunt, but it turns out that the Mississippi hunt never required much in the way of night operations. I haven’t had a real hunt since then, much less a blood trail to follow, so I decided just to strap the lights on and mess around out on the ranch. I was pleased with the performance of both headlamps.
Both are very lightweight, which is a major consideration to me. I’ve used some of the heavier headlamps, and besides their bulk, they also tended to give me a headache after extended wear. The Dorcy lamps were barely noticeable. I kept one on most of the evening in MS, just to see what would happen. By the time I was ready for bed, I’d forgotten it was there (I won’t blame the Scotch).
They also provide plenty of light. While I thought I’d prefer the spot beam, I found the broad beam to be most useful while I was poking around in the pumphouse one night, trying to track down a leak. My pumphouse is black widow haven, and I’ve sort of got a thing about spiders. With the headlamp, I could see in all the little nooks and crannies before I put my hands in there. The coverage was excellent, and the light was even and steady.
The spot beam seems to be pretty impressive as well, lighting up the ground nicely from a standing position. The light is bright white, which I think is best for picking out a trail in the dark, as well as looking for blood. I’m still not sure if this would do the trick for some of the harder blood trails I’ve dealt with, but it is better than most of my other headlamps (I don’t own any of the really high-end headlamps for comparison). I also found that the unit fits well in the palm of my hand, and when I use it this way it really lights up the ground. It may not be perfect, but I believe it will work well.
Both lamps run on three, AAA batteries, and the literature says they’ll provide full power for about 12 hours. Honestly, I’ve never tested a light to see if it really ran as long as advertised, and that’s no different with these. I do know the LEDs tend to be very conservative with battery power, so I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect extended battery life. I like the fact that these lamps are powered by ordinary batteries, rather than some proprietary components that you can only buy through the company website or certain “authorized” dealers.
Are there specific negatives? I didn’t find much to complain about with these lights, although there were a couple of things that I think I should point out.
Like many of these headlamps, the lights have three functions… full power, half-power, and strobe. To switch functions, you depress the on/off switch. This means that to turn the light off from the full-power position, you have to click twice. It’s a small thing, but I find it a nuisance. If, for some reason, I wanted to turn the light of in a hurry, there’s really no good way to do it. You have to cycle through the other functions before the light goes off. Personally, I’d rather have a single-function on/off switch, and if the other functions are really necessary (I’m not sure they are), have a second switch to change modes.
Another thing… the lights are not waterproof. I realize that, from a manufacturing perspective, waterproofing is a bigger deal than it may seem, and it generally increases the cost of the product. However, under real field conditions, it’s almost guaranteed that a light will eventually be submerged. I’ve dropped lights in the pond while setting decoys, they’ve fallen into creeks while packing hogs out after dark, and they’ve sat in waterlogged packs for hours during elk hunts.
The Dorcy website suggests that the headlamps are “lightweight weather resistant”, which I take to mean that they can withstand a drizzle while hiking to the stand, or possibly hold up while setting camp in the rain. I didn’t test them to see how much they can actually take before failure (I’d like to keep them around a while), so maybe they’re a lot more robust than they seem. I did take a closer look at the construction, and it’s obvious that there’s no significant weather seal around the battery compartment. The on/off switch is rubberized, but it doesn’t look like there’s any sort of gasket around the switch to keep water from running down into the guts of the light. What this means to me is that the Dorcy lights wouldn’t be my first choice for serious, backcountry hunters. I also don’t think it’s the best bet for waterfowlers or fishermen. That sort of application is going to require something that’s really waterproof… not just “weather resistant”.
But overall, I think these are pretty danged good headlamps. For the weekend camper, the treestand hunter, or for the day hunter, it’s a perfectly good, economical light. I plan to keep the broad beam version in my truck, where it should be a handy part of my tool kit. Both the broad beam and the spot are very bright and clear, the unit is lightweight, and the retail cost is completely manageable.
The Dorcy lights get a qualified thumbs-up.
December 19, 2012
So ever since switching over to the new site at the beginning of this year, I’ve got to say a lot of things have changed. My readership has gone down drastically, my posting schedule has dropped off (hard to be as motivated), and I’m not seeing the opportunities to test and review products. The truth is, without the promotion from the old host site, I’m not getting exposure outside of my circle of regulars (thank you guys!). I never got paid much, but I’m getting nothing now… neither ads nor pay-per-post. And without a big audience, the major companies aren’t particularly interested in sending me expensive things to write about. But I can write what I want, when I want, how I want, and whatever I turn out here is mine and no one else’s. Freedom isn’t free, I suppose…
It all goes hand in hand, of course, and I’m not gonna bemoan it. I’m simply pointing this out as my way of saying, I haven’t got a lot of new stuff to recommend for Christmas gifts this year. And that’s probably OK, because if you haven’t done your shopping by now, nothing I could promote here is likely to get you off of the hot seat. Seriously, if you’re stumbling around and looking for gift ideas at this point, you’d probably do well to roll on over to one of the big box department stores… or hit your local Cabelas or Bass Pro.
Or, grab the construction paper, glue, and magic markers.
It’s not that I haven’t had any ideas or suggestions, especially when it comes to building out your library. In February, I reviewed my online friend, Tovar Cerulli’s book, The Mindful Carnivore. It was a really interesting look at hunting from a really different perspective. I also reviewed Steve Rinella’s book, Meat Eater, and while I didn’t personally care much for it, I know a lot of other hunters who really enjoyed what Rinella had to say.
For the wannabe gunsmiths out there, the collectors, or the serious afficianados, I also really like the Firearms Guide series of DVDs. For pure information about pretty much any gun you can think of, this is a great and growing resource. I also think this disk would be required for anyone who writes about guns, whether you’re a journalist, blogger, or novelist.
If you’re looking to stuff some stockings, ammo makes a great (and weighty) option to really make those socks sag. Toss in a box or two of Winchester ETips for their favorite hunting rifle, or some Barnes VorTX handgun loads for that hog pistol.
But if you’re looking for something really new and unique for the hog hunter on your list, I may have the perfect thing. It arrived in an unsolicited email the other day, and I almost deleted it. For whatever reason, I clicked on it instead.
There’s something about a nice hip flask that’s always sort of appealed to me. Maybe it’s the fantasy of the “gentleman hunter” coming through, or maybe I just like to have a nip from time to time, but pulling the flask from a convenient pocket, unscrewing that cap, and tipping it up just makes returning to camp at the end of a long day a little nicer. The introduction to this email suggested that the sender was the manufacturer of a nice hip flask, with a wild boar on the front of it. I clicked on the attached photo to see what we were dealing with, and I was pleasantly surprised. This is not the standard, stamped stainless steel, made in Taiwan piece of junk.
I went ahead and visited the web site, Taliesin Pewter, and enjoyed a virtual visit to an English craftsman’s shop. They make a lot more than just flasks, but since that’s what I came to see, I poked around a bit. These are some nice pieces, and honestly, I don’t think the prices are too out of line either… in the neighborhood of US $70 (based on current conversion rates). In addition to the hog, there are several sporting designs, including stags, waterfowl, and grouse.
This is definitely something I’d like to find under my tree on Christmas, and I bet many of you guys know someone who’d like something like it as well.
If you’re still shopping, good luck. If you’re done… well, good luck anyway. You know there’s someone you’ve forgotten.
August 21, 2012
Steven Rinella has become something of a celebrity in the world of hunting television, with some crossover attention from the foodie-quadrant. In his initial television outing on The Travel Channel, he hosted The Wild Within, and then went to The Sportsman Channel with, Meat Eater. His focus in both of these programs, as well as in his books and magazine articles has largely been on the feast that’s available just outside our doors, which is a very popular topic these days.
Personally, when I first heard about Rinella’s program on The Sportsman Channel, I shuddered. Images of Bear Grylls and “Survivorman” ran through my head. I hated those shows, especially Grylls’s hyper-bravado and the stupidly unnecessary things he would do for shock effect (hey, I know some of you folks liked those shows and more power to you… I found them ridiculous, and they got worse as each episode strove to out-shock the other). I dreaded another program just like the rest.
But some folks I know spoke highly of Rinella, so I opened my mind and watched a few episodes. I was pleasantly surprised. His personality on screen doesn’t seem over-inflated, and his hunts are pretty real. He’s a meat hunter (and fisherman), and that’s the focus of each episode. I wouldn’t necessarily call myself a fan, and I certainly haven’t watched every episode, but I found very little to quibble with on his program. If it comes on while I’m watching The Sportsman Channel, I don’t reach for the remote.
OK… three paragraphs in, and I’m yet to get to the point.
A couple of weeks ago, I got an email from Rinella’s publicity folks. He’d just released his third book, titled Meat Eater, Adventures from the Life of an American Hunter, and they wondered if I’d like to give it a read and a review. It sounded like a good opportunity to get a closer look at this guy through his writing, and I’m always up for something new to read. So last week, I went to my mailbox and found the hardback waiting for me.
I wasn’t sure when I’d find time to read, with all the work I needed to do around my place, but a back injury settled me down right quick. Unable to do so much as push a broom for a few days, I kicked back in my recliner and cracked it open.
As is my usual habit, I didn’t read the background materials that the publicist sent along with the book so I really wasn’t sure what it would even be about. I figured with the same title as his program, it would be about hunting for meat. Maybe there would be some hunting stories or some cooking tips. But I didn’t really expect an autobiography (as well as some hunting stories and cooking tips).
That’s what it is, though. The book is essentially the story of Rinella’s development into the character we see on his television program today… extended backstory for the television program, as it were.
A few years back, there was a recruiting poster, I think for the Navy, that asked, “If your life were a book, would anyone want to read it?”
This poster occurred to me several times as I read through Meat Eater. I mean, honestly, Steve Rinella isn’t that big a celebrity. Outside of a relatively small circle, no one has a clue who he is. If I were browsing the bookshelves and saw this, I probably wouldn’t read past the jacket blurbs. And now that I have read the entire book, I can honestly say that I wouldn’t be much the poorer for missing it.
Was the book a complete waste of time? No.
Once I relaxed my preconceptions (and got past those first few pages), I don’t begrudge the time I spent on it. At points, it did take me back to my own childhood and early teen years in the North Carolina woods… geographically distinct from his Michigan environment, but I think the way we saw it was pretty much the same. It’s an honest portrayal, warts and all, of his development as an outdoorsman, and at the end I came away with an appreciation of who Steve Rinella is and where he came from. I think this will likely color my perspective on his television program from now on, in a positive way. At no point did I just want to close the book and go find something else to read.
At the same time, though, I guess I didn’t see anything particularly novel here. If I tried, I could probably name a dozen friends who came up in the outdoors, hunting, fishing, and trapping pretty much just like he did. Most people I know who started young in the outdoors went through similar stages of moral and ethical development as they formed their own, unique relationship to the outdoors. Heck, my own story isn’t all that different… except that where he went on to turn his passion for the outdoors into a career, mine remains an expensive hobby. (And yeah, I get that this is a big difference.)
It was not unlike trying a new restaurant and finding nothing particularly new or memorable in the experience. It did not excel, nor did it suck… at least to my tastes. In a week, I doubt that I’ll remember any specific passage from Meat Eater. In a year, I doubt I’ll even remember reading it.
Would I recommend Meat Eater? If a copy falls into your hands, yes, check it out. It’s not a bad read. But would I recommend you go out to buy it? I don’t know.
As a guide for new hunters, there’s not much in the way of instruction or even solid guidance (in fact, a good part of the book reminisces about breaking wildlife laws.. and in some cases seems to attempt to justify it). I don’t think that a new hunter would find much value here… especially a new hunter who is coming to the sport late in life. Maybe a youngster, a young teen who is already crazy about the outdoors would enjoy this. But even then, I can think of better books.
As an adventure story, it lacks… well… it lacks adventure. Rinella certainly has had some cool hunting experiences, but he’s definitely no Robert Ruark. Maybe it’s his laid back writing style, but even his most harrowing experiences didn’t seem particularly exciting. A couple of them just seemed like stupid ideas… which could have made for great humor, except Rinella doesn’t seem to capitalize on those opportunities very well.
For the foodie there are far better books out there, both instructional and anecdotal, that would offer far more value. The “Tasting Tips” at the end of each chapter are the closest thing to actual food writing, and these are mostly general.
When it comes down to it, the only person I would feel like recommending this book to is to the hardcore, Steve Rinella fan. I do think you can really get a good feel for who he is, and where he comes from in this book. So to a fan, this could be really great information. But honestly, if you’re not a really big fan, I don’t think you’re going to care all that much.
Note: This is my opinion, and I have some pretty specific tastes when it comes to books. I know that several other bloggers are reading and reviewing this book right now. It may be worthwhile to take a look at some of the other reviews in addition to mine.
July 27, 2012
In 2010, I met a couple at the SHOT Show who were talking to various gun and outdoors writers about their new CD-ROM based Firearms Multimedia Guide. When they came to my table, I happily sat and chatted with them. They told me about their project, a plan to create a huge, comprehensive database of firearms from around the world. The CD would serve as a resource for gun writers, gunsmiths, and anyone who had a detailed interest in firearms from around the world. I can’t remember how many guns were included in that first edition (my review is still out there on my old site), but it was fairly impressive. I was also impressed with their plans to continue compiling the database, so that the Guide would be sort of a living research tool. At the end of the conversation, not only did I have a copy of the CD to review, but I’d made a couple of new friends.
I saw them again in 2011 with their new edition, so of course I took a copy and did a write-up. Their database had grown significantly (to around 50,000 firearms), and they were now incorporating printable schematics for all sorts of guns, as well as online listings for gun stores around the country. As an added bonus, they added in some fun stuff, like printable targets.
For 2012, they have released the 3rd edition. The new Guide is bulked up with 55,000 firearms, including military firearms, as well as air guns and ammunition listings. The schematics database is up to 3000 guns from 268 different manufacturers. In short, this thing has become pretty danged robust. Despite the extent of the data, though, the DVD offers a really solid search functionality. You can narrow down a search to fairly minute detail. For example, suppose you wanted to find an American made, 9mm with accessory rails for under $750. You can enter all of those criteria into the search fields and see all of the options available to you. Try that in Google or Bing!
Who could use the Firearms Guide?
As I mentioned earlier, gunsmiths could definitely benefit from the ready access to schematics for many firearms. It’s also a great way to look up specs and details about some less common guns and ammunition. As a ”sort-of amateur wannabe” gunsmith, I can see where I will be able to use the Guide for working on some of my own guns.
Collectors, of course, will appreciate the extensive listings, photographs, specs, and even retail prices that they will find in the guide. You could use it to identify an unusual gun, or to search for something you want to add to the collection. Crazy about drillings? The guide has a whole listing from various manufacturers and in different caliber/gauge configurations. There are even several bespoke rifles in the database, should that be something of interest.
For the hunter or target shooter looking for a new gun, the Guide offers the ability to do your shopping from your desktop. You can sort guns based on the criteria you like, the price range you want to pay, and even locate a nearby dealer when you’re ready to make your purchase. Of course, it may not be the most efficient purchase for someone looking to buy just one gun, but say you’ve got a group of friends planning that big elk hunt or African safari. Split the $39.95 price three or four ways, and it’s totally worth it… especially if you’re the lucky one who gets to keep the DVD after the shopping is done. If you’re like me, sometimes it’s fun just to surf around the various listings to daydream about guns you’d like to own (my fantasies tend to revolve around the fine, express rifles).
The Guide should be an excellent resource to writers and journalists, as well as others who need solid information and data about firearms. As I’ve mentioned before, it should be a required tool in any newsroom. There’s no excuse for some of the misinformation and erroneous reporting on guns with resources like this available. For the fiction writer, there’s a wealth of cool information about guns that your characters could use (for good or ill).
All in all, the Firearms Guide 3rd Edition is a solid upgrade to an already excellent product. It is quickly becoming a definitive source for gun information, and it’s getting more extensive with every release.
For more information, or to order the Firearms Guide 3rd Edition, you can go to their website at: http://www.firearmsguide.com.